Priority Based Scheduling: 3 Strategies to Ensure Your Schedule Matches Your Intentions
The Sunday Session #14 - Read Time: 4 Minute
Scheduling to match your priorities will require some tweaks to your current scheduling protocol but will exponentially improve performance, streamline the process involved and consequentially improve outcomes.
Researchers within this field advise that we use the following strategies:
​Schedule with intentionality
​Create a regular time block for weekly scheduling (The Sunday Session) and each evening for daily planning. This distraction free space will allow you to schedule intentionally and carefully select the high impact, meaningful activities that will help you on your success journey.
Having a copy of your main goals and priorites along side your scheduling planner will allow you to ask 'Is this activity essential in ensuring my life is on an upward tradjectory?'.
If not, cancel the activity, which will free further space for your real priorities.
For those engagements which are essential, such as meetings, ensure a strict agenda and a finishing time to allow you to schedule around this. This ability to reject or limit meaningless engagements coupled with an accurate overview of the week will allow you to combat the Achilles' heel of effective planning - overscheduling.
Overscheduling ultimately leads to an intensity over consistency mindset.
Intensity, defined as 'the quality of being felt strongly or having a very strong effect', is neither sustainable nor tenable in the long run and will lead to inadherence and regression if attempted for an extended period of time.
‘The data are clear; complete the minimum effective dose for optimal progression and leave the rest to the magic of compounding.’
Block time for significant tasks
​Tasks of significance and complexity, our best work, require laser-like focus.
With research unequivocally showing that multi-tasking, or multi-focusing as it is now known, is inefficient, reducing both quality and quantity of work produced, we must avoid being interrupted when undertaking 'deep work'.
Research attests that it takes roughly 15 minutes for an individual to reenter flow state after having been interupted.
The cost of interruption is high, and with some professions claiming that interruptions are frequent, with the average principal being 'interrupted every 9 minutes' (Fullan 2014), the repercussions and consequences are obvious.
The modern leader must protect this time ruthlessly, creating an environment where uninterrupted work is the norm.
​Set a limit on distraction devices
​Modern professional tools can be as distracting as those who work alongside you.
‘Each and every e-mail, message, alarm and engagement ping is like a Vegas neon sign on your screen demanding your attention.’
Even the sight of a notification has been shown to create an anxiety response in some people, diminishing their work flow, even if they choose to ignore it.
​For those who decide to engage with the notification, work flow has been interrupted and you are now attending to the desires and agendas of others.
All work e-mails, texts and notifications are calls to task - something else to be put on the to-do list and something else to take the focus off the task at hand.
​This being said, I am firm believer in collborative work, but collborative work that works in unison with individual work. To ensure prompt response to the requests of others, but uninterrupted work flows, I choose to disable all notifcations from my phone, and schedule blocks of time to check e-mail, social media and messages twice per day. Of course, in the case of real a emergency, colleagues can always get in contact via phonecall.
​Interestingly, some CEOs have ignored email for weeks on end to study the consequences of such and many have reported little to no impact on company productivity and ironically that the majority of emails were of no relevance or self-remedied over time.
They found that colleagues, usually under stress, created emergencies out of minutia which disappated organically.
​It is clear that we must use our time wisely to ensure that we live a life of meaning and fulfillment. Seneca (2005), in my estimation, sums up both the problem and its solution exquisitely:
'It is not that we have a short time to live, but that we waste a lot of it'
Journalling Points
Do I have a scheduling routine?
Is my schedule congruent with my main priorities?
What activities do I need to remove?
What, if anything, should I replace those activities with?
Bibliography
Ballard, J. 2020, Exercising more and saving money are the most popular 2020 New Year’s Resolutions, YouGov, Washington
Belludi, N. 2008, Budgeting Your Time by Your Priorities, Right Attitudes, London
Berkin, S. 2005, The Art of Project Management: How to Make Things Happen, Microsoft, San Francisco
Choi, C., 2020 New Year's Resolution Statistics, Finder, New York
Fullan, M. 2014, The Principal - Three Keys to Maximising Impact, Jose-Bass, San Francisco.
Haden, J. 2020, A Study of 800 Million Activities Predicts Most New Year's Resolutions Will Be Abandoned on January 19: How to Create New Habits That Actually Stick, Inc., New York
Seneca, L.A., On the Shortness of Life, Penguin Books, New York